Back to Stories & Gossip

Why Isn't Taysom Hill the Starting QB? The Uncomfortable Truth

Reviewed by: Bestie Editorial Team
A symbolic image illustrating the strategic dilemma of why isn't Taysom Hill the starting QB, showing a player as both a chess piece and a powerful athlete. why-isnt-taysom-hill-starting-qb-bestie-ai.webp
Image generated by AI / Source: Unsplash

It’s a familiar scene. The offense is sputtering, the pocket is collapsing, and the energy in the stadium feels flat. Then, number 7 trots onto the field. The defense shifts, the crowd leans forward, and for a moment, anything feels possible. He migh...

The Question Every Saints Fan Asks on Sunday

It’s a familiar scene. The offense is sputtering, the pocket is collapsing, and the energy in the stadium feels flat. Then, number 7 trots onto the field. The defense shifts, the crowd leans forward, and for a moment, anything feels possible. He might take a direct snap and lower his shoulder for a brutal first down, or he might launch an unexpected deep ball. He’s a spark plug, a human multitool.

And as he walks off the field after a successful play, the same question echoes from living rooms to sports bars: If he can do that, why isn't Taysom Hill the starting QB? It feels like a logical paradox. You see a player making a tangible impact, a force of nature that defenses struggle to account for, and you can't help but wonder why he isn't handed the keys to the entire offense. The frustration is real, but the answer is more complex than what the highlight reels show us. It's a calculated decision rooted in strategy, film study, and the uncomfortable truths of the quarterback position.

The 'Eye Test' vs. The Film: What Coaches See That Fans Might Miss

First, let's validate what you're feeling. As our emotional anchor Buddy would say, "That frustration isn't irrational; it comes from seeing undeniable passion and talent." When you watch Taysom Hill, you see raw athleticism and a will to win that is both rare and electrifying. It's easy to fall in love with the player who runs with the power of a fullback and the heart of a lion.

That feeling is completely justified. You see the immediate, visceral result of his presence: a broken tackle, a crucial first down, a defense thrown into chaos. That's the 'eye test,' and he passes it with flying colors. It's the part of the game that feels intuitive and obvious. Your gut tells you that this guy should be on the field more, and your gut isn't wrong about his impact.

However, coaching staffs are paid to look beyond the gut feeling. They spend hundreds of hours in dark film rooms analyzing not just the successful plays, but the mechanics behind every single snap. They’re looking for the quiet details that determine long-term success, and that's where the conversation around why isn't Taysom Hill the starting QB begins to shift from a simple question to a complex strategic analysis.

The Uncomfortable Truth About His Passing Game

Now for the reality check, delivered straight from our resident realist, Vix. "He didn't 'forget' how to be a pocket passer. The league has a very specific, and brutal, definition of one." The brutal truth is that being an incredible athlete and being a franchise quarterback are two different jobs with overlapping, but not identical, skill sets.

Let’s look at the facts. A starting quarterback in the NFL has to do more than just make a few spectacular plays. They must demonstrate elite `consistency as a pocket passer`, week in and week out. This means standing in the pocket, reading complex, disguised coverages, progressing through three or four receiving options in under three seconds, and delivering the ball with precision timing and accuracy. This is where the `Taysom Hill criticism` from scouts and coaches is most focused.

While Hill can certainly make all the throws, his film shows inconsistency in the finer points of the position. The subtle `game management skills`—like knowing when to throw the ball away versus forcing it into a tight window, or consistently hitting a receiver in stride on a 15-yard out-route—are areas where he has struggled compared to established starters. The question of why isn't Taysom Hill the starting QB often comes down to this: can he execute the routine, 'boring' plays that sustain drives, not just the explosive ones that make the highlight reel?

The Strategic Choice: Is He More Valuable This Way?

This brings us to the strategic lens of Pavo, our master strategist. The decision to limit Hill’s quarterback snaps isn't a punishment; it's a deployment strategy. As Pavo would frame it, "Don't think of him as a failed quarterback. Think of him as the most versatile weapon on the board."

The central issue is a matter of maximizing value. As a full-time quarterback, Hill’s limitations might be exposed over a 17-game season. His unique threat as a runner would be used less to protect him from injury, and defenses would have a much larger sample size of film to study his tendencies as a passer. His `utility player limitations` in a pure QB role would become more apparent.

However, in his current role, he is a strategic nightmare for opposing defensive coordinators. Is he a quarterback? A tight end? A running back? This uncertainty creates mismatches and defensive hesitation. As Saints coach Dennis Allen explained, his role allows for formational flexibility that benefits the entire `offensive scheme fit`. His true `value as a gadget player` lies in this unpredictability. The answer to why isn't Taysom Hill the starting QB is that his value to the team is arguably higher as a Swiss Army knife than it would be if he were locked into a single role. It’s a classic case of the sum of the parts being greater than the whole.

FAQ

1. Could Taysom Hill be a starting QB for another NFL team?

It's possible a team with an offensive scheme built around a mobile quarterback might see him as a viable starter. However, most teams prioritize elite consistency as a pocket passer, which has been the main point of criticism in evaluations of Hill.

2. What makes Taysom Hill's NFL statistics so unique?

Taysom Hill is one of the most statistically unique players in NFL history. He is among a very small group of players to have recorded significant yardage in passing, rushing, and receiving, showcasing his incredible versatility.

3. Why is Taysom Hill's role often debated by fans and analysts?

The debate exists because his 'eye test' performance is often electric and impactful, leading fans to wonder why that doesn't translate to a full-time starting role. The discussion highlights the difference between a great football player and a great quarterback, which are not always the same thing.

4. How does the Saints quarterback situation influence Taysom Hill's usage?

The presence of a more traditional pocket passer on the roster allows the Saints to use Hill strategically without relying on him to manage every aspect of the offense. This preserves his health and maximizes his unpredictable impact on the game.

References

cbssports.comSaints' Dennis Allen explains Taysom Hill's role, why he's not a full-time QB

reddit.comTaysom Hill becomes the only player in NFL history...