Back to Personal Growth

Is It a 'Type' or a Trap? The Psychology of Having a Dating Type

Bestie AI Pavo
The Playmaker
A woman reflecting on the psychology of having a dating type, seeing her past repeating relationship patterns in a hall of mirrors. psychology-of-having-a-dating-type-bestie-ai.webp
Image generated by AI / Source: Unsplash

You see a headline about Kendall Jenner and another NBA player and you feel a flicker of something beyond gossip—it’s recognition. It’s the quiet, internal question that follows: Is this me? Not the celebrity or the athlete, but the pattern. The grav...

The Celebrity Mirror: Why Your Dating Life Feels Like a Rerun

You see a headline about Kendall Jenner and another NBA player and you feel a flicker of something beyond gossip—it’s recognition. It’s the quiet, internal question that follows: Is this me? Not the celebrity or the athlete, but the pattern. The gravitational pull toward the same energy, the same dynamic, the same ending, just in a different package.

It’s the frustrating feeling of relationship déjà vu. You start dating someone new, and for a while, it feels different. But soon, the familiar script begins. The same arguments surface in a different kitchen. The same anxieties bloom in your chest over a text from a new phone number. You find yourself playing the same role you swore you'd retired.

This is where the real question emerges, moving from a casual observation to a deeply personal inquiry into the psychology of having a dating type. Is this a harmless preference, like enjoying a certain kind of movie? Or is it an unconscious trap, a revolving door that keeps leading you back to the same emotional room, just with new furniture? You're here because you suspect it might be the latter, and you're ready to find the real exit.

The Déjà Vu Dilemma: Recognizing Your Relationship Groundhog Day

Alright, let's cut the fluff. This isn't a cosmic coincidence. That string of partners who were 'emotionally unavailable,' 'too busy with work,' or 'just not ready for a commitment' didn't just randomly find you. Your emotional GPS is programmed to seek them out.

As our realist Vix would say, 'Stop calling it a type and start calling it a pattern.' A preference is choosing brunettes over blondes. A pattern is choosing people who make you feel like you have to earn their affection. See the difference? One is an aesthetic; the other is a dynamic. These repeating relationship patterns are not a flaw in your character; they are a feature of your programming.

The hard truth is that your 'type' feels comfortable because it's familiar, even if 'familiar' means a low-grade state of anxiety or disappointment. It's the devil you know. Acknowledging the specifics of the psychology of having a dating type in your own life is the first, non-negotiable step. You can't fix a leak you pretend isn't there. So, let’s stop admiring the water damage and finally look at the pipes.

Your Attraction Blueprint: How Your Past Picks Your Partners

To move from Vix's blunt observation into a space of understanding, we need to examine the blueprint. This isn't random; it's a cycle, and cycles have origins. Our sense-maker Cory helps us connect the dots between our past experiences and our present attractions.

The core of this lies in what's known as Attachment Theory. Developed in our earliest relationships with caregivers, our attachment style—be it secure, anxious, or avoidant—becomes the invisible framework for our adult romantic connections. If you grew up having to be 'perfect' to receive love (anxious attachment), you might unconsciously seek partners who are distant, creating a stage where you can endlessly try to prove your worth. If emotional intimacy felt unsafe or smothering (avoidant attachment), you might be drawn to partners who are fiercely independent, ensuring things never get 'too close.'

This is where the psychology of having a dating type gets deep. It's not just about what you want; it's about what feels like 'home,' even if home was a complicated place. Experts suggest that our 'type' is often a composite of traits from significant figures in our past. This concept, sometimes explored through Imago Relationship Theory, proposes that we have unconscious attraction triggers. We are drawn to people who represent both the positive and negative traits of our caregivers, subconsciously hoping to heal old wounds by 'fixing' the dynamic this time around. These attachment theory dating choices are powerful and operate just below the surface of our consciousness.

As Cory would remind us, this is not about blame. It's about awareness. So here is your permission slip: You have permission to acknowledge that your 'type' might be a blueprint drawn by a younger version of you who was just trying to feel safe.

Recalibrating Your Radar: 3 Steps to Attract a New Reality

Understanding your blueprint is liberating, but insight alone doesn't change your life. As our strategist Pavo would state, 'A map is useless if you don't use it to choose a new destination.' Now, we shift from analysis to action. It’s time to consciously override the old programming and begin breaking unhealthy dating cycles.

Here is the plan to move beyond the theory and actively change the psychology of having a dating type in your favor.

Step 1: Conduct a Relationship Audit

Forget romanticizing the past. Get pragmatic. For your last three significant relationships, create a 'Fact Sheet.' List the objective data:

How did you feel most of the time? (Anxious, secure, ignored, cherished?)
What was the core conflict? (Communication, commitment, values?)
How did it end, and what was your role in that ending?

Look for the patterns. Don't judge them. Just identify them. This is your data.

Step 2: Define the 'Anti-Type' Dynamic

Based on your audit, your job isn't to find a different-looking person; it's to find a different-feeling dynamic. If your type made you feel 'anxious,' your new target is 'calm.' If your type was 'unpredictable,' your new target is 'consistent.'

This will feel strange. A secure, consistent person might initially feel 'boring' to a nervous system wired for chaos. Your brain will scream 'no chemistry!' Pavo's advice: 'Chemistry is often just the recognition of a familiar wound. Aim for peace instead.'

Step 3: Practice 'Safe Discomfort' with High-EQ Scripts

Breaking the cycle means choosing the unfamiliar. This requires conscious effort. When you meet someone who doesn't fit the old pattern, and your instinct is to pull away, use a script to guide your actions, not your feelings.

Instead of thinking: "This is boring, there are no sparks."
Say to yourself: "This feeling of calm is new. I will stay curious and explore it for one more date."

Instead of creating drama to test their affection, say this to them: "I'm used to more inconsistent communication, so your consistency feels really new to me, and I appreciate it."

This is the work. It's about recalibrating your internal compass, one conscious choice at a time. It's less about a magical transformation and more about disciplined practice in the art of breaking unhealthy dating cycles.

From Pattern to Preference: Choosing Your Future

Coming to terms with the psychology of having a dating type is a profound act of self-reflection. It begins with seeing a pattern in someone else and ends with understanding a blueprint within yourself. The journey from a pattern to a true preference isn't about eradicating your history or vilifying your past choices. Every relationship, no matter how painful, provided data.

Your history is not a life sentence; it's a curriculum. The goal isn't to find a 'perfect' person who fits a new, flawless mold. The goal is to become a person who chooses from a place of conscious self-awareness, not unconscious repetition. It's about having the freedom to decide if someone is truly right for the person you are today, not just familiar to the person you once had to be.

FAQ

1. How do I know if I have a dating type or just a preference?

A preference is about surface-level qualities (e.g., sense of humor, shared hobbies). A 'type' becomes a problematic pattern when it consistently involves the same negative emotional dynamics (e.g., emotional unavailability, commitment issues) that lead to the same painful outcomes, regardless of who the person is.

2. Why am I attracted to people who are emotionally unavailable?

This attraction is often rooted in attachment theory. If your early experiences taught you that love is something you must earn or that intimacy is unsafe, you may unconsciously seek partners who replicate this dynamic. It feels familiar to your nervous system, even if it's logically unhealthy.

3. Can I change my attachment style?

Yes, attachment styles are not fixed. Through self-awareness, therapy, and consciously choosing to date and form relationships with securely attached individuals, you can develop 'earned security.' It requires recognizing your patterns and intentionally practicing new ways of relating to others.

4. What is Imago Relationship Theory in simple terms?

Imago Relationship Theory suggests that we unconsciously choose partners who resemble our primary caregivers in both their positive and negative traits. The theory posits that our subconscious is trying to heal childhood wounds by recreating similar dynamics in our adult relationships, hoping for a better outcome this time.

References

psychologytoday.comWhat Having a 'Type' Says About You | Psychology Today

en.wikipedia.orgAttachment theory - Wikipedia

youtube.comWhy You Keep Dating The Same Person Over and Over | The School of Life